Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roeland Paardekooper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Roeland Paardekooper[edit]
- Roeland Paardekooper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 00:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not seem to meet the notability standard or to have received substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete fails WP:PROF. probable WP:AUTOBIO. LibStar (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vanity autobiography. -- Ohc ¡digame!¿que pasa? 03:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.