Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocky Kimomo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky Kimomo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article made unambiguous claims and is written like advertisement, possibly in violation of WP:SOAPBOX. The article appears to be part of a series of promotional articles. Deppty (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Deppty (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment how notable are the Made in Rwanda awards? Oaktree b (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~, article is written like advertisement, I don’t see any reliable coverage. Deppty (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Your nomination is considered your "vote". Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That an article is written like an advert is an argument for copyediting not deletion. I've seen many many articles with fq mre egregious bubbles o' guff in them than this one.TheLongTone (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we lack good significant coverage. That is needed to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.