Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock City, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rock City, California[edit]

Rock City, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another case of mistaken identity by GNIS. Rock City is geologic formation in Mount Diablo State Park. Durham calls it a relief feature. It has never been a community. Some interesting rock formations with nearby picnic tables. Not notable. Glendoremus (talk) 22:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Rock formation is not a community. I wouldn't be opposed to a redirect to Mount Diablo State Park but right now I'm not seeing sufficient coverage to justify it. –dlthewave 02:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete Negligent editing, introducing false content with disregard to WP:V and WP:N. This user has created several other false articles in this county; I have prodded two so far and redirected another. Reywas92Talk 22:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mount Diablo#Mount Diablo State Park.   // Timothy :: talk  01:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the nom. Fails WP:GNG and is a false article as is. I would add that the creator of this article was indef-banned for being a sockpuppet less then a week after it was created, which further implies they did not have good intentions when creating this article. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.