Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robslee Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robslee Primary School[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NSCHOOL this article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. WP:BEFORE revealed only WP:ROUTINE coverage and brief mentions, nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV which addresses the subject directly and in depth and is an WP:IS There was a lot of routine coverage about the school closing. // Timothy :: talk 08:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 08:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 08:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 08:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not notable. A a s i m 08:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete long standing consensus is that virtually no primary school is notable. There is nothing in any way suggesting this school is an exception to that general rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Totally agree with above comments. A primary school existing does not mean it has notability that would warrant an article. I see no sign here of the sort of special significance or sustained coverage that would make it notable enough to have its own Wikipedia page. Dunarc (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.