Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin des Champs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:39, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robin des Champs[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, even if some of its progeny are. Nothing in article suggests meeting WP:NHORSERACING. Article had no references at all until after animal died. Kevin McE (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; notability is not inherited from the horse's progeny, and it doesn't appear to meet notability criteria on its own merits. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Raiju - this fails WP:GNG due to no true claim of notability. Kirbanzo (talk) 19:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ref ^(chew)(do) 19:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Article seems to fail WP:NHORSERACING and WP:GNG in general. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"""Keep""" Why delete it? User:Lucifero4

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.