Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road signs in Uganda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Road signs in Uganda[edit]

Road signs in Uganda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Road signs in Uganda

This article has no sources. It is an image gallery rather than an encyclopedic article; see Wikipedia is not a gallery.

A copy of this article was created in article space, and was moved to draft space by User:Asukite, but this copy has been created in article space again, so that a second draftification is not possible. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete As per nom. un-Referenced article in-fact i should say a gallery does not fulfill wiki Guidelines. GermanKity (talk) 03:00, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think speedy delete applies here (although WP:A3 is close). Mlb96 (talk) 05:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I put in the source already. Kingwarnen (talk) 10:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kingwarnen, I see the PDF uploaded to pdfcoffee.com, which looks like a user hosting site. While I applaud your use of a public domain attribution, something we don't always see here, the source in question being hosted on a user-uploaded site calls it into question, and although it is government-published, it doesn't really address the main issue with the article: it's still pretty much just a gallery, with no in-depth encyclopedic content. The policy that Robert McClenon cited (WP:NOTGALLERY) would strike me personally as the most convincing argument for deletion in this discussion. I know I linked Road signs in India as an example, which bears striking similarity to this article, but does at least have a bit more descriptive coverage, if it is a bit lacking (and may have avoided being nominated for deletion so far because it's been around much longer)  A S U K I T E  23:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per my message above - if we could expand the text content in this article to alleviate the gallery issue, and add some more sources, I might change my mind, if anything because Road signs in India still exists. A S U K I T E  23:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.