Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riskdata
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Nakon 05:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Riskdata[edit]
Yet another corporate buzzword. Links that seem to be trying to act as sources appear to be primary. Looks like just more "proactive" "spin" to "me". JuJube (talk) 15:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, one should not delete the page. It describes a risk approach developed some time ago. In financial riskmanagement there are more approaches, this is one of them. The difference is very important today with new investment vehicles not being passive in nature anymore.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ribi111 (talk • contribs) 15:21, January 18, 2008
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 18:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sourced. The article itself is fairly confusing, and I think much of that is because it uses terminology that is esoteric and/or nonstandard without defining it in a way or giving enough context that even an educated layperson interested in finance can understand. There doesn't seem to be anything in the article that defines the subject of the article, something called "riskdata." If that is in the article, it's not stated. It says it's a process but it doesn't say what the process is, who invented it, why it's useful, etc. Riskdata is a trademark term belonging to somebody or another, so if it's notable enough for an article it should have some sources, and the article should concentrate on whatever product or service it is that is trademarked. The general discussion of risk management probably belongs in some other article. Wikidemo (talk) 09:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.