Talk:Riskdata

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

procedural close, February 2 2016, see discussion.
delete, February 2 2016, see discussion.
Delete, January 17 2008, see discussion.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... it describes a financial software company with strong involvement in risk calculation methodology. Moreover, numerous competitors of Riskdata are already described on Wikipédia without more content: Statpro (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StatPro_Group), RiskMetrics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RiskMetrics), Linedata (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linedata_Services), SimCorp (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SimCorp)... I would like to understand why the article is not admissible while it highlights new mathematical methodologies in finance: Risk Ticker, Shock VaR and Bias Ratio to propose more relevant content next time. Thank you.--AlizeeHisquinR (talk) 16:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand where you're coming from. It seems as if the competing articles which you specified have already been marked as advertisements and/or non-notable subjects. I think it would make sense for those to be deleted as well as this, as it is unfair to you if your competitors are able to have pages while you are not. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 13:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

However, I would like to note that this article is not currently nominated for deletion, but rather marked with tags regarding its language and notability (much like those other articles). R. A. Simmons ^Talk 13:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advises to improve the article. I created links from other existing articles in Wikipédia to our page. I also specified some of the sentences that were not precise enough or that seemed to be advertising. I hope this would help to make the article acceptable.