Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Marazano (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Marazano[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have multiple reasons for putting this in an AfDD.

1. The person who wrote most of the article has the username Marazano. If you check him on the French Wikipedia, you will see that his user page says that he is an author. 2. For me, it fails WP:GNG, because the vast majority of the article only praises him for his writings, and the vast majority of it is unsourced. The only sources are ones confirming he wrote those books, not that they have gotten "critical acclaim" and "positive reviews", like the article states. 3. I have put this on AfDD before, but only 1 person voted (excluding a sockpuppet). Cheers! // 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 14:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Science fiction and fantasy. Cheers! // 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 14:45, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. "Marazano" uploaded the image of Marazano that is featured in the article, and used "Own work" when publishing it. Huh. Cheers! // 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 14:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Visual arts, Comics and animation, and France. Netherzone (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus.

Previous discussions: 2023-04 (closed as no consensus)

Related discussions: 2023-04 S.A.M. (comics) (closed as redirect)

--Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strewth' the sourcing is rubbish! The second reference no longer points at anything to do with Marazano at all, and the other three barely mention his name. They are indeed reviews of the books, but only the sort of review I would expect of any book that's been published. He's clearly been involved in some successful books. What we really need here is some input from someone who actually knows about French Bande Dessinée who can assess which of the plethora of reviews are meaningful. Elemimele (talk) 10:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed some of the low-quality citations. 🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 09:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' Per nominator. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 01:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An obvious autobiography and case of self-promotion. Curiocurio (talk) 18:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.