Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renault Energy F1-2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguments for deletion seem significantly stronger than those in favor of keeping the article. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renault Energy F1-2014[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page contains almost no content aside from a name and the date that images of it were released. It appears to have been created so that 2014 Formula One season cars and Red Bull RB10 - both of which have been nominated for deletion - are not orphaned. Although there have been some instances where Formula One engines have dedicated articles, such as Cosworth DFV, this is mostly reserved only for particularly notable engines. Otherwise, this kind of information is usually included in sub-sections of other articles. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 04:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep The nominator seems to be nominating F1 articles for deletion because they do not fit his preconceptions of how the topics should be handled. The topic has ample notability - see Racecar Engineering, for example, and the rest is a matter of ordinary editing not deletion. Warden (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep This article that I created contains verifiable information about a notable new F1 engine. Its notability is evidenced by the already wide cover of it. Freimütig (talk) 21:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: What wide coverage of it? According to the article, the only piece if information available is that Renault released pictures of it. Are you sure this isn't a case of WP:ILIKEIT? Prisonermonkeys (talk) 21:53, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As it is, the article link misleads the reader into thinking that more details about the engine is available, when in fact the article simply rehashes basic data from the 2014 Formula One season page. When/if more details become available then it would be the right time to (re)create this article. C1010 (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article only contains name of the engine and nothing else. StandNThrow (talk) 05:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article contains virtually no information that isn't also in 2013 Formula One season. The article may need to be recreated in the future, if the engine proves especially notable for some reason, but right now it's not necessary. DH85868993 (talk) 10:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it's the new F1 engine from Renault. They powered the champions for several years. Burgring (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.