Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remnoy, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remnoy, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A California Public Utilities Commission report of 1953 describes Remnoy as "a non-agency station" it permitting its closure. As usual, label drift has caused the location to deviate from the original spot, but old enough topos show a single building, obviously the station, where in the past five years an irrigation pond has been dug. Other than that it's just field after field. The bit about the "juke joint" was added by an IP and is hardly credible, not that it adds significant notoriety. Mangoe (talk) 04:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND. Part of a mass article-creation campaign based on use of bad sources, and misstating what good sources say. FOARP (talk) 12:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO. // Timothy :: talk 16:13, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.