Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reet Sharma (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reet Sharma[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable child artist with so many claims to notability but there are no independent sources to back them up. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:TOOSOON to merit a page. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:03, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - This has been already discussed over Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reet_Sharma. There is another link referencing Mid Day link to the article. The reference presented is from Times Of India, India's biggest news channel.Tanishq (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Tanishqsh (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

@Tanishqsh: FYI this passing mention by Mid Day nowhere mention anything about her life or career except using her picture and the TOI source is the only source that support her role in Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon?...Ek Baar Phir which is insufficient to support WP:GNG as explained by Shrikanthv and Anupmehra in the previous AfD. GSS (talk|c|em) 03:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per previous AfD discussion. Ross-c (talk) 19:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ross-c: can you please explain briefly which point from the previous AfD made you vote as Keep here? Let me tell you that none of those claims were verifiable so if you can provide some soruces that support her role in films or TV series listed in the artcile you are most welcome otherwise I ask you to reconsider your vote position. GSS (talk|c|em) 03:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: - sufficient roles in films and sufficient mentions in sources such as Times of India. I read the AfD discussion, agreed with the keep conclusion, and don't see that enough has changed to change that conclusion. Ross-c (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ross-c: Are you sure? The TOI source reads ...and the kids will be played by Lakshay Wahi and Reet Sharma. can you please point out where it says about her role in the films listed in the article or anything else? GSS (talk|c|em) 05:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I have voted and I have explained my reasoning. I'm not interested in debating this any further. Ross-c (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ross-c: Perfect so it means you are simply ignoring to have policy-based argument where you failed to prove the subject passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR and this sound like WP:JUSTAVOTE. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--What GSS sez and Anup said......~ Winged Blades^Godric 04:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete actors who have appeared in only one TV show is not something that would be expected to have an article on English Wikipedia. Search doesn't produce any coverage and substantial information in the independent RS about the person therefore I can't see any significance. --Saqib (talk) 16:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is just not enough reliable sources to pass GNG or NACTOR and especially with the single source that states "and the kids will be played by Lakshay Wahi and Reet Sharma". This BLP (held to a higher standard of sourcing) fails BIO1E possibly because it is far too soon. Otr500 (talk) 04:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 02:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NACTOR. FITINDIA 12:19, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, & WP:NACTOR hands down. I could find just one source & it mentions her in passing. BTW, the creator of this article was paid to take her photos, so there seems an undisclosed WP:COI as well. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.