Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reef Station, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reef Station, California[edit]

Reef Station, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The GNIS compilers dropped the ball on this one, because in older topos, this place is labelled "oil pumping station". The older aerials are not high enough resolution to make sense of but they aren't inconsistent with the GMaps shot, which shows an obviously industrial facility. Perhaps the GNIS folks didn't have another term to use for such a site, but it's obviously not a "populated place" nor a "community" of any sort. Mangoe (talk) 03:58, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Engr. Smitty Werben 04:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND. Part of a mass article-creation campaign based on use of bad sources, and misstating what good sources say. FOARP (talk) 12:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO.   // Timothy :: talk  16:07, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.