Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Leaf Poetry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Author request, nomination was by the only other contributor. L Faraone 23:53, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Red Leaf Poetry[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable poetry club. They have announced their poetry contest on their twitter feed (https://twitter.com/RLPoetryIndia), but that's hardly a reliable source. The article author informs me that they intend to enlist Ranjit Hoskote and Arundhathi Subramaniam as jurists for their contest, which might make the organization notable, but only a) if they can pull it off; and b) any independent source takes notice. However, until then, I don't see this poetry club as meeting our criteria for inclusion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:29, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 13:47, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 13:47, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:ORG. Brand-new club that hasn't done anything notable yet. Tiny number of Twitter followers underscores just how small and non-notable this is. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GO AHEAD DELETE IT ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuclear23 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Comment Can we consider this as the equivalent of a {{tl:db-author}}? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:29, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.