Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Apollo (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Red Apollo (disambiguation)[edit]

Red Apollo (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find two instances of 'Red Apollo': Red Apollo (Group) and the butterfly common red Apollo, which has no article or red link. Disambiguation is not necessary. Leschnei (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator; almost meets Wikipedia:G14. Geolodus (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The common red apollo does have an article under its scientific name Parnassius epaphus. The band is probably not notable and so this is a case where a hat note could suffice per WP:ONEOTHER. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and {{For}} either the butterfly or the hackers. The band can probably be discounted as it doesn't even have sufficient content on deWP. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:26, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with hatnote at primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 22:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.