Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Quality Wrestling

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:44, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Real Quality Wrestling[edit]

Real Quality Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable wrestling promotion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 21:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 21:27, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 21:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T/C) 21:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as "org spam". K.e.coffman (talk) 01:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Non notable promotional article about a promotional effort that strains to assert some hint of significance and fails to do so. The hunt for RS is in vain Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.