Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Nadal statistics and results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael Nadal statistics and results[edit]

This page replicates (I assume the author has copied and pasted) information that can be found at Rafael Nadal. No new content and it is not being updated. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 19:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If its already in the article of Nadal, then why create a new article. Redundancy. Lehoiberri (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Idea to cut the length of the Nadal article didn't prosper. Delete. ☆ CieloEstrellado 03:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.Rafael Nadal had gotten a bit too unwieldy. This was a good idea for a split. I did the actual split so nothing is repeated. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:29, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Tennis expert (talk) 04:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This should not be a separate article. It should be part of the results and statistics sections in the Rafael Nadal article, as with every other tennis player article. The creation of this page violates WP:Notable - it's just a record like everyone else's, not something to be put on a pedastool (sorry WP:AGF). Please restore back to the main article and delete this. ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 04:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The split makes sense if the article is becoming too unwieldy with stats and figures. I imagine there is considerable interest in having an article like this as full details of Nadal's stats will simply not fit in the main article, or else would distract from the main body (the most important part). My main concern is that it has no citations/sources/references. I would suggest instead that it be userfied until correct citation is given and the details are verified. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 10:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC) (See WP:Preserve)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.