Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PushEngage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PushEngage[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Straightaway PR/Advertising WP:PROMO. Lack of credible third-party citations. Currently, most of its news coverage comes from paid/sponsored media and PR sites. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 14:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing adds up to WP:ORGCRIT. Normal mentions and press release but nothing in-depth.--CNMall41 (talk) 18:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I think an article on Ravi Trivedi might pass WP:BASIC if it was created (something Nitin.35 might research and consider), then some of this content could go there, but this article doesn't have sources that cover the topic directly and in detail to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT and it's too WP:PROMO. // Timothy :: talk 03:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability Spiderone 08:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.