Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulsar 590 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pulsar 590[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This headset does not appear to meet the notability guideline for products or the general notability guideline due to a lack of lasting significant coverage. SITH (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SITH (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The device had an independent main subject review in The New York Times ([1]). If the nyt gave it its own reviewed piece you can garauntee other publications covered it too. I don't think WP:BEFORE was followed.4meter4 (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Additional reviews I found include:

"Explore the world from your desk: Google and Microsoft are both testing ambitious new mapping programs. Beware: Even guys who are genetically incapable of asking for directions will be addicted.(Business Life/gadgets)(Column)(MSN Virtual Earth and Google Earth)(Product/Service Evaluation)". Lewis, Peter; Fortune, Sept 5, 2005, Vol.152(5), p.158
"Untether Thyself: Four cures for portable audio's attachment disorder.(Product/Service Evaluation)"; Regenold, Stephen, Popular Science, Oct 1, 2005, Vol.267(4), p.1

Best.4meter4 (talk) 03:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The device has also been used in peer reviewed research contexts. See: "Inducing circular vection with tactile stimulation encircling the waist"; Tinga, Angelica M ; Jansen, Chris ; van Der Smagt, Maarten J ; Nijboer, Tanja C.W ; van Erp, Jan B.F, Acta Psychologica, January 2018, Vol.182, pp.32-38; and "Response to tendon vibration questions the underlying rationale of proprioceptive training."; Lubetzky, Anat Vilnai ; Mccoy, Sarah Westcott ; Price, Robert ; Kartin, Deborah; Journal of Athletic Training, Feb, 2017, Vol.52(2), p.97(11)4meter4 (talk) 03:21, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Can expand by adding new sources and descriptions.WikiAviator (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.