Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 20:46, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudo-Legendary Pokémon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed by Kirbanzo with the rationale Not a subject suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia, as it is purely about a fictional work and is better suited for a fansite. WP:IINFO, WP:NOTGUIDE, which was removed by the creator. I basically agree with this; much like with the related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garchomp Evolution Line, there aren't reliable sources showing significant coverage of this group. Nearly everything out there is about how to play the game, get the pokémon, etc., which is why this page is the same. Moreover, per Bulbapedia, this is a fan-generated category, not an official grouping. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete page seems like an entry from a fan wiki about Pokémon, and not really suitable for a Wikipedia Article. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here} 16:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my same reasoning at Garchomp Evolution Line. Praxidicae (talk) 16:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect to List of Pokémon is fine, but I'll note that the creator has redirected a number of pages for these pseudo-legendaries to this new page away from that list. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored the previous targets of those redirects. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Aoba47 (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 18:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my PROD rationale as well as nom. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 14:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fan-made category. No reason to keep. InvalidOS talk 16:06, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Important Category on the subject of Pokémon 19:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.237.127.33 ([[User talk:209.237.127.33#top|talk]) — 209.237.127.33 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Sockpuppet vote removed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I will try to fix the problems you guys have listed, but I believe that this page is both important and necessary. Professor Profession (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for one week for abusing multiple accounts (and IPs) here. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Perhaps we should improve this page to better fit the Wikipedia tone, but I think that it is a good topic. jacobhartj7 (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2019 (UTC) — jacobhartj7 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Sockpuppet vote removed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This page needs some work, but I love it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:442:4580:2190:8CBB:68AF:1863:D1B1 (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC) — 2601:442:4580:2190:8CBB:68AF:1863:D1B1 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Removed sockpuppet vote. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I disagree, this page is a category of Pokémon, and shouldn't be deleted MemeLord888 —Preceding undated comment added 21:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC) — MemeLord888 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Removed sockpuppet vote. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:48, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable outside the game itself --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:09, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:FANCRUFT. Nothing else. Ajf773 (talk) 23:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.