Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probabilistic Innovation Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probabilistic Innovation Theory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of the clearest cases of using Wikipedia for original research that I have seen. This appears to be almost entirely sourced to Callaghan as a primary source. No evidence of other reliable sources commenting on this theory. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G8, G11, and A7. 216.235.231.28 (talk) 17:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- and I suspect written by the selfsame Callahan Rhadow (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a glance at the article's history will indeed show. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 01:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article could be used as a canonical example of WP:NOT#OR. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 01:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW as OR. Bearian (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above - not alot more to be said really. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.