Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Michael Jackson#1995–1997: HIStory, second marriage, and fatherhood. As a compromise between the two most supported options (the keep argument appears to lack supporting evidence); if someone wants to remove the redirect they can try at WP:RFD Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Jackson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject has no personal notability, strong case of WP:NOTINHERITED WWGB (talk) 05:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is the son of one of the most notable musicians and has been doing things in the entertainment field. I am in the process of expanding the article, so deleting it would be a mistake. After all, his sister has a page. It makes sense for both Prince and Paris to have pages. Their younger brother however doesn't need a page since he is still a minor and has not started a career just yet. --MusicAndArtFan (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Michael Jackson#1995–1997: HIStory, second marriage, and fatherhood as he is not independently notable (yet) as a musician and notability is not inherited. I am also skeptical of a GNG claim - substantial coverage involve Prince actually has his father as the primary topic in the cases I saw. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Michael Jackson#1995–1997: HIStory, second marriage, and fatherhood. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 01:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete passing coverage because his father is so notable does not make him notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is completely missing. We don't need article or redirect for every relative's name. Excelse (talk) 10:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 22:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable and not substantially discussed as his own person in the Michael Jackson article. Let him have privacy. Daask (talk) 20:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According IMDB prince is an actor and a single google search will brings lots of search results about him, thus Redirect to Michael Jackson#1995–1997: HIStory, second marriage, and fatherhood as it is a plausible search term. No need to delete the article as redirects are cheap.--Akhiljaxxn (talk) 01:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC) duplicate !vote de-bolded. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I see no reason not to redirect to Michael Jackson; Prince Michael Jackson II redirects there and Paris Jackson probably should as well. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.