Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Albert of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ 14:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Albert of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication of significant coverage as required by WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. The subject had a military career, not that you would know from this heavily genealogy-oriented article, but that appears not to make him any less obscure. Wikipedia is not here to chronicle the marital and reproductive exploits of undistinguished princelings. Surtsicna (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater@ 14:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and the other comment above.Smeat75 (talk) 00:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is nothing more than a genealogical record. The topic fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything directly and indepth about this individual because they have done absolutely nothing notable. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY of non-notable members in royal families. // Timothy :: talk 05:33, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or merge to his father's article, Friedrich, Duke of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg. Normally, I'd say delete, because he doesn't appear to have done anything notable, but I'm concerned because this guy was named the heir to a royal house, and he "connected" two royal families, so the outright deletion would destroy important links. West Virginian, what do you think? Bearian (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.