Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pravrajika Divyanandaprana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without prejudice to draftification $Salvio$ 09:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pravrajika Divyanandaprana[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NPROF or WP:BASIC. WP:BEFORE showed no WP:IS, only routine coverage or promotional articles. // Timothy :: talk 05:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please also note that discospinster moved the article to draftspace and noted their concerns. I don't believe these concerns have been addressed in subsequent revisions and the article was ~~returned to~~ recreated in mainspace. // Timothy :: talk 05:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TimothyBlue, I'm a bit confused by the order of events here. It seems to me that discospinster moved the article to the draft space, and then Ashukmr created a new version in the mainspace, with the draftspace article still remaining. Is this correct? Sam-2727 (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Sam-2727: I was mistaken, I assumed the article had been moved back from Drafts, but it seems to have been simply recreated and there are two now, one in Drafts and this one here.

First Article created in mainspace by Ashukmr at 09:54, 18 August 2020‎
First Article moved to Drafts and creator notified by Discospinster at 09:58, 18 August 2020‎
Second Mainspace article created by Ashukmr at 09:58, 18 August 2020‎
Second Mainspace article Last updated by Ashukmr at 10:37, 18 August 2020‎

They appear identical except for two added refs in the second article. The timing makes me this was a glitch I actually assumed it was not possible to have the same title in Drafts and mainspace at the same time. discospinster does this look like a glitch to you? // Timothy :: talk 01:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the original creator was making an edit at the same time I was moving it, so that when they pressed "save" it ended up recreating the article from that point. ... discospinster _talk 01:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete can't find any exact matches on google, some unreliable sources return inexact matches. Fails GNG through and through. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It seems very strange to me that the creator was still working on the article when it was tagged. More time should be allowed for further improvement, either by the creator or other editors.--Ipigott (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replyy: Ipigott, It was moved to drafts when they were working on it. It was tagged after it was idle in mainspace for 2 days, its been 5 days now since its been edited. Plus, this is about notability. If there are no sources (and no one has been able to find any) for notability, it can be deleted. // Timothy :: talk 14:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.