Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerhouse Wrestler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Powerhouse Wrestler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Article is mostly a dictionary definition, with no independent sources. TN X Man 14:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is very similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-flyer wrestler, which closed with a decision to redirect to List of professional wrestling terms (although this seems a little strange, since there is nothing about high flying wrestlers on that page). I would suggest redirecting this as well and adding both terms (high flyer and powerhouse) to the list if sources can be found to show that they are actual terms used in professional wrestling. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. -- Θaks ter 14:29, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nominator.--Curtis23's Us al ions 17:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.