Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-flyer wrestler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of professional wrestling terms. The consensus seems to be for redirect as a compromise solution, pending future expansion. DGG ( talk ) 05:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

High-flyer wrestler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

orphaned, unreferenced, original research, no indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Contested prod. RadioFan (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe keep The article could use some polishing up, but if it can be established that this is a recognized category of wrestler then it should be kept. If this is just one person's opinion then delete. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ It's clearly a term that's in use by fans (based on a Google search), but I can't find reliable sourcing. However, if anyone is able to find sourcing where I could not, I immediately change this to a keep because, again, the term's one that is obviously being used. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 06:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of professional wrestling terms, where it isn't listed but should be. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect--I'm going with Starblind here. Term exists, but I can't easily find reliable references--and the article gives no reason why it should be kept. Drmies (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it should be listed in List of professional wrestling terms only if it can be referenced. If that is possible, then I'd agree to a redirect as well, otherwise, it should be deleted.--RadioFan (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to Redirect Starblind very much has it right. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 15:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.