Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postmen DA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 18:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Postmen DA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. The only claim of significance of this company is that it is "one of the TOP-10 digital agencies in Ukraine" according to the Ukrainian Advertising Coalition. But according to this source, the UAC only rates 22 digital agencies, so falling into the top 10 of such a small group is not really that notable. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unsourced and would fail WP:NCORP even if sources were found. shoy (reactions) 12:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train^talk 06:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.