Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornography in Saudi Arabia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pornography in Asia#Saudi Arabia. Alex Shih ^Talk 05:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pornography in Saudi Arabia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is some notability of the topic, but in current version of the article it does not add any significant information to Pornography_in_Asia#Saudi_Arabia Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 14:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A10 - what is in this article that is factual is in the other. Only other content is WP:OR analysis. John from Idegon (talk) 15:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC). Since the speedy was declined, Redirect seems the best. There isn't an article here. John from Idegon (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the duplicated page. Seems like it would be a valid redirect. 331dot (talk) 18:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pornography in Asia#Saudi Arabia. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep: @John from Idegon, 331dot, and Theroadislong:, when the articles was listed here for deletion discussion, I, the creator of this article, had made only one edit to this article. All users develop articles in several edits, the article was not ready. I have improved the article by adding relevant information cited to sources, I shall continue to improve and request all of you to do so. There are also other articles about pornography in countries at "Category:Pornography by country". It easily meets WP:GNG, Please review your comments, do not disheart me. Thanks! Sinner (talk) 15:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest in future you use the WP:AFC method of creating articles, they are less likely to be deleted, this article is VERY poorly written and sourced and is not required. Theroadislong (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: There is already a page listing the stance on pornography on a country-by-country basis, so it might as well be put there to keep the encyclopedia tidy. I don't see this becoming a full-blown article, but more of an informational snippet. - NsTaGaTr ^(Talk) 16:28, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let the discussion to go to Hell, I'm moving the article to draft space for development. Sinner (talk) 00:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nazim Hussain Pak, you can only do that if there is a consensus here to do that. You need to read WP:OWN. You should have started the article in draft space. But you didn't. Others have edited it. It is not yours to do with what you want. As soon as you press the save button, everything you add to Wikipedia ceases to be yours to do with what you wish and becomes the sole property of Wikipedia; subject to community consensus, which is what this discussion is here to determine. John from Idegon (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2017 (UTC)John from Idegon (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted move to draft space and removal of AfD tag. Oppose draftifying this article in its present form.John from Idegon (talk) 01:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.