Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Chitgopekar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP There were several nontrivial mentions of the subject in secondary sources. Non-admin close. Xymmax (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Chitgopekar[edit]

my understanding is that game show contestants are not considered notable for inclusion in WP. pageant contestant is essentially the same thing. Anastrophe (talk) 06:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: She is not only a contestant, she was a runner-up of "Miss Earth 2007" pageant. The pageant show was a widely televised event and that itself should assert her notability. Arman ^(Talk) 07:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously. --NAHID 10:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: i'm not clear what is 'obvious' about it. by my reading of WP:Notability (People), she doesn't qualify as notable: "Participation in and in most cases winning individual tournaments, except the most prestigious events, does not make non-Athletic competitors notable. This includes, but is not limited to, Poker, Bridge, Chess, Magic:The Gathering, Starcraft, etc.". Anastrophe (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: As Miss Earth is a global pageant this can easily be classified as one of "the most prestigious events". Had it been a national or regional pageant, there could be a debate. Arman ^(Talk) 07:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - That what I was trying to convey. --NAHID 16:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – A number of verifiable, reliable and credible source found here [1] at Google News. Shoessss | Chat 17:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.