Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podeollie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 20:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Podeollie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, nothing to indicate notability (and nothing comes up on a web search). Noiratsi (talk) 13:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the canine equivalent of a non-notable neologism, article admits as such.TheLongTone (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can find no sources or references to this at all, so well and truly fails WP:GNG. SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:MADEUP. Wikipedia is not for dog breeds you made up one day.--TKK ^{bark !} 20:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. TKK says it best; Wikipedia is not for dog breeds you made up one day. bobrayner (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:SNOW --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.