Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plutus.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Plutus.com[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Plutus.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable crypto company. Sources are all PR or un-RS, with little to no coverage of the company, beyond routine things. Oaktree b (talk) 02:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 02:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, crypto spam. I removed the crypto sources and there's just press releases left. Should be G11'ed - David Gerard (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.