Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plasmaphone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plasmaphone[edit]

Plasmaphone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been able to find no evidence that any instances of this musical instrument exist beyond the ones created by Steve Mann and/or his colleagues for a pair of performances in 2007. Just like the term "quintephone" (also coined by Mann and currently up for deletion), the term is a longstanding neologism. Zetawoof (ζ) 01:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No reliable sources confirming its existence outside use by one individual. Meatsgains (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The best references I found were these 2 papers by Steve Mann. [1] (citation count 4 at Google Scholar) and [2] (citation count 13 at Google Scholar, but 2 at acm.org). For me this is WP:TOOSOON. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, I just noticed that the article seems to have been created by an account which seems closely linked to Steve Mann. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:22, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: no evidence for notability. Also no evidence that the concept was accepted by anyone except its creator. OtterAM (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.