Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizza Joe's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 18:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pizza Joe's[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article falls well short of establishing notability. Of the six sources, four are the company's own web site. The other two are "puff pieces", only one of which is about the company (and reads more like an advertorial), the other is about its founder. The style of the article is also problematic, reading more like an advertisement, right down to listing what is on the menu. But the main problem remains the failure to meet WP:GNG. Gronk Oz (talk) 00:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve, it is relevant just not well written. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP Mosaicberry (talk) 00:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - are there reliable sources to support that, Mosaicberry? Perhaps you could list some of the best; I have not found them. --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Be realistic... they obviously fail general notability right now. Trillfendi (talk) 03:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:MILL. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the fundamental problem is that this is a run of the mill company that simply exists which doesn't satisfy the level of notability to support Wikipedia presence. Graywalls (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.