Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinar Aksu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinar Aksu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable person. Some references are her personal bolg Zebras234 (talk) 12:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 13:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 13:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 13:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.Zebras234 is currently under sockpuppet investigation so I would suggest not deleting this article, especially when it is very constructive and well referenced.--Azerifactory (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The case filed against Zebras234 by Azerifactory has been deleted as frivolous. I have no comment on the notability of Pinar Aksu, which should of course be the focus of this AfD.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see anything in the article, or through google searches, which suggest she meets either WP:BIO or WP:POLITICIAN. At least four of the links in the article are from websites affiliated to her, like leftproject, Scottish refugee council or Unite against Facism. At least two of the links (this and this) are trivial mentions in fairly identical news stories that she's one of many attending a political event. In the others she gets brief quotes e.g in this link. Socialist worker gives her the most coverage, but it's very questionable whether that's a reliable source (previous discussion suggests it isn't and a left wing political activist being covered in a left wing publication in any case falls short of establishing notability. Valenciano (talk) 19:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:51, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Absolutely non-notable. She graduated, she joined a political campaign or two, she has opinions. Nothing at all to indicate notability. If she is notable, so are millions of others in the UK and Scotland. Emeraude (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence to establish notability. Zcbeaton (talk) 00:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not finding enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.