Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Savings Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing early per WP:SNOW Mark Arsten (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine Savings Bank[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per WP:COMPANY. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per my rationale in the UnionBank nomination. This is a publicly-listed company which has significant third-party coverage (see this and this for examples). --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 11:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sky Harbor. We should get rid of the long list of directors and officers, however, and we could consider merging what's left to Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company#Domestic subsidiaries and affiliates, if that seems appropriate to the Philippines-experienced editors. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- At one point I removed it, but someone reinserted it and it has stayed ever since. I can revert it though to the original, which includes a bank history. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 00:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Easy Keep - same as the other 20 Banks prodded and AFDed. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, then a 2nd nomination may be pursued. –H T D 12:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 04:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.