Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Bank of the Philippines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing early per WP:SNOW Mark Arsten (talk) 07:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Union Bank of the Philippines[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established per WP:COMPANY. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's the seventh-largest bank in the Philippines, a publicly-listed company, and if the nominator actually did his due diligence (where the contrary is becoming increasingly apparent), he would have noticed that the bank has significant coverage (see this, for example). --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 11:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly where does it say that it's the seventh largest? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Publicly-listed company, significant coverage. -- The Anome (talk) 14:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A major economic player in the Philippines and subject of plenty of coverage. Article could use some cleanup but notability is established.--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all the other Philippines banks AFDed. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per Sky Harbor. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 04:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.