Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter I. Smith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA1000 20:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peter I. Smith[edit]

Peter I. Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

minor politician. no real newslinks, even less than you would expect for a politician. fails WP:GNG John from Idegon (talk) 01:10, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nomination, fails to meet WP:POLITICIAN. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 03:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete As A7. First District representative on the Anne Arundel County Council is not a credible claim to importance, let alone notability. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – The consensus is that county council member is not a notable office. The main story about the subject seems to be the long, drawn-out process of his appointment, but that's also a local story. – Margin1522 (talk) 08:04, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - (notability, WP:POLITICIAN, blah blah blah). As much as I would like to press the A7 button, it looks like "First District representative on the Anne Arundel County Council" is a "credible claim of importance". After all, there might be some people (from the Anne Arundel County, probably) who view the function as important. Tigraan (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per everyone above me - Clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN. –Davey2010Talk 20:54, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Fails the POLITICIAN high bar as not an elected politician to high or sufficiently high office. Carrite (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.