Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Percy Barnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Article is undergoing improvements including sourcing by several editors (non-admin closure) // Timothy :: talk 13:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Percy Barnett[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NACADEMIC. Sources in article and WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 07:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 07:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 07:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article as nominated was in a pretty dire state but I found entries for him in two major modern biographical dictionaries; I think that's enough (and that there's enough other material in the article as well to support an article). —David Eppstein (talk) 09:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.