Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulin Basinga publications

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paulin Basinga publications[edit]

Paulin Basinga publications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no reason to have a list of someone's publications on Wikipedia, this is what Google Scholar and Research Gate etc are for. Since a PROD was contested, it has to go to AfD (perhaps speedy delete). This page should not be merged to Paulin Basinga as a long list is not useful in a BLP. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: it's odd that the article about the person isn't linked, but they have one. This list isn't needed, and I have my doubts the individual is notable either. Most ref's in their article seem to be interviews in Nigerian media, none from his home country. Suspect more "pay to publish" notability... Oaktree b (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I've also nominated the article on Paulin Basinga for deletion, does not appear notable either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Medicine, and Lists. WCQuidditch 15:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, WP:NOPAGE; the publication list is on Scopus and other databases, linked from Paulin Basinga, and doesn't warrant a separate page. I agree that a merge is unwarranted, as the content is no needed on that page (MOS). Klbrain (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: per nom and Klbrain. Suprised there isn't a speedy criteria for this, but after the declined PROD, this (and not merge) is the right choice. If the author wants access to it to improve the Paulin Basinga page they should draftify/user-space it now. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 00:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Klbrain. hinnk (talk) 04:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.