Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Lample

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Lample[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC Serv181920 (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Serv181920 (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete we need a-multiple sources and b-sources independent of the subject. In this case we have one source which is created by the organization he is a board member of. This is not the stuff notability is made of.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Maybe his authorship could provide some notability. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 21:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - failure of WP:BASIC; complete lack of sources independent of the subject Spiderone 22:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.