Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul J.R. Renaud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paul J.R. Renaud[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable. See previous revisions of the article for more references (I have removed sections for copyright violations), but those sources do not appear to substantially prove notability. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 13:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as pure spam. Clearly an employee has been tasked with the job of writing a promotional piece about her boss. Unfortunate. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete mere PROMO of a non-notable, business promoter.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is written like a public relations profile and referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage shown whatsoever. It's also a conflict of interest, as the creator's username plainly identifies her as an employee of Renaud Investments. As always, Wikipedia is not a free LinkedIn clone — people are not entitled to decide for themselves that they get to have a Wikipedia article, but rather we make that decision according to our rules. Bearcat (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.