Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Andrews (producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Andrews (producer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet general notability guideliness. Citation needed warning appears throughout article, and existing citations go to dead links. Lord of the East (talk) 05:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:31, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Andrews fails WP:BASIC as there are no "multiple secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". My searches bring up either CEOs of the same name for other companies, or self-published books results. The references seems to be either unreliable or passing mentions and the article looks like a WP:PROMO case. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.