Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick d'Udekem d'Acoz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick d'Udekem d'Acoz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article exists solely because he was the father of the wife of the Belgian monarch, which is against WP:INVALIDBIO. The subject has received no significant coverage that would satisfy WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Virtually nothing aside from him having existed and died has been reported by reliable sources. The entire article content is plainly described as "Genealogy", yet Wikipedia is not meant to be a genealogy database; see WP:NOTGENEALOGY policy. Surtsicna (talk) 09:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 09:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 09:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to either d'Udekem or Queen Mathilde of Belgium#Early life and family. TJMSmith (talk) 12:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no indication of notability.Smeat75 (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or merge as suggested. There's news coverage only because his daughter is queen and his grandchildren are royalty by birth. Bearian (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect/merge targets needs to be decided
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp 💬 17:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This article is a genealogical record and Wikipedia is WP:NOTGENEALOGY. The article does not meet WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. There are no reliable sources independent of the subject that cover anything about the subject directly and indepth. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE: "As explained in § Encyclopedic content above, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." // Timothy :: talk 01:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete The entry is almost noting but genealogy. Mangoe (talk) 02:18, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.