Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Barnitt
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Patrick Barnitt[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Patrick Barnitt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe this person passes the notability criteria for inclusion. Most of his appearances in films are insignificant (failing WP:NACTOR) and as a singer he hasn't had a charting song or anything that would help satisfy the criteria for musicians (WP:MUSICBIO). There is also a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources discussing the subject. Flooded with them hundreds 14:18, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:MUSICBIO as mentioned above. No reliable sources are included, nor can I find any significant coverage via a Google news search. Also - there appears to be a conflict of interest and/or original research. Jmertel23 (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Appears to be a vanity article created by SPA editor under different user names/IP addresses. Sources are minor, nothing significant that indicates notability or encyclopedic importance. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - You were right; it was one editor using multiple accounts. They have since been blocked. Jmertel23 (talk) 15:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing in the article establishes notability and no reliable and verifiable sources were found in a Google search to support a claim of notability. Alansohn (talk) 04:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, and WP:MUSICBIO. -- LACaliNYC✉ 19:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.