Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palumõisa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 20:15, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Palumõisa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

in general, former villages in Estonia are not worth of its own article. Ad hoc solution: redirecting to List of villages in Estonia Estopedist1 (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional keep if the information is verifiable. This is a bit harder for an English-speaker to decide than a location in California. What I do know, though, is that the nominator's statement is untrue, Wikipedia:Notability#Notability is not temporary. Geschichte (talk) 16:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Geschichte: There are thousand and thousand former villages in Estonia. Do we really want this superclutter for enwiki? If we want, then in general, there are extremely hard to find more info than 1-2 sentences per the former village. See eg et:Kategooria:Eesti endised külad ('category:Former villages in Estonia') --Estopedist1 (talk) 08:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I looked at the other language page while I suspect that with good research the article could be made to meet WP:NGEO "Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. " but I don't know that. My own search is hampered by language issues. No objections to recreating an article where meeting WP:NGEO can be established. Jeepday (talk) 11:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All settlements, existent or not, are notable under WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.