Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PNM Building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PNM Building[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. The article makes no claim for general notability WP:GNG or historic, social, economic, or architectural importance WP:NBUILD. Article sources and WP:BEFORE revealed mill type local coverage and directory style listings. Nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. This is a normal building, not an encyclopedic topic. // Timothy :: talk 05:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 05:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete Yet another misbegotten Brutalist child of the sixties that even at the time nobody seems to have cared about, much less now. Not seeing the notability. Mangoe (talk) 16:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the original page creator (from back in 2005) and I agree there probably isn't enough to justify an article. I do think that some of the content would be relevant to PNM Resources so my suggestion is to merge to that article under a "Headquarters" section. PNM also has a former headquarters which is a historic building so that could be discussed there also. Camerafiend (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NBUILD and my own standards. My mother lived in the ABQ area for 18 years, and I've been there at least 15 times: this is not even a locally notable building. I would not oppose a merger. Bearian (talk) 20:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.