Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osagie Alonge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Osagie Alonge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:CREATIVE. Sources are self-published and non-reliable. The article is promotional too. Perhaps too soon! Hellbrix25 (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete obviously fails WP:GNG. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 05:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Clearly meets the WP:GNG. Article revamped as per WP:HEYMANN i have added more sources about the subject. Also keep in mind this tag was added by a blocked user This account is blocked as a sock further to Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Accounts, based on both technical (CheckUser) and behavioural/editing pattern evidence. JazzyB07 (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that the article was nominated for deletion by a blocked user is irrelevant. I don't see how this one can be kept per WP:HEYMANN when it obviously fails WP:GNG. None of the sources you provided are reliable. They are self-published materials that cannot establish notability. The truth is, the guy is not just notable. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 20:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the added sources are self-published. Can somebody add something better? Bearian (talk) 15:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

added some more sources and also linked his name in Nigerian Entertainment Today as he was NET’s famed Editor-in-Chief and Assistant Manager in 2014. The name was there already but it was not linked to this page. JazzyB07 (talk) 10:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 10:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 11:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: threshold for notability not reached; fails GNG, ENT, .... Quis separabit? 21:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : as per my search on google news and WP:GNG also the sources provided (from 3 to 11 then 13,16,17 and 18) doesn't seems self promotional. MannTinsa (talk) 06:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing administrator. MannTinsa (talk · contribs · count) and JazzyB07 (talk · contribs · count) are Confirmed socks of each other.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.