Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onse, San Juan, Metro Manila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. after the work by two good editors, there is no longer reason to delete. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Onse, San Juan, Metro Manila[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The contents of this article are questionable. The primary author of the article has introduced misleading images on multiple occasions which were removed by other editors. Examples of the removal of images can be seen here: diff 1, diff 2, diff 3, diff 4. The only image on this page which is a flag is questionable and looks like it could have simply been made in paint. This whole article has been unsourced and for quite some time. The history section is also questionable. I find it hard to believe that after more than two centuries of Spanish rule, that this area was discovered considering that Manila, a major city is geographically very close. Elockid ^(Talk) 20:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding on to my delete rationale. I also have doubts on the validity of the historical population figures. While it states that the data is from the National Statistics Office, the NSO to my knowledge only publishes city data every censuses. None of the dates listed are from censuses. The Philippines has a census every 5 years (with the exception of 2007) with the last one in 2010. Elockid ^(Talk) 15:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: be the content what it may, Onse barangay in the city of San Juan in the Philippines is a verifiable inhabited locality: see, for example, Google Maps. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 03:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I seen it very unconstructive. It has to be a significance between the areas of San Juan, Metro Manila and this area. It doesn't seem that this area is recognizable here in the Philippines. Such barrangay's/towns do not need much appropriate existency. So I'm agree to Delete it. Hamham31 Heke!KushKush! 03:53, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Though the barangay does exist and is easily notable given its population size and especially as a village of this megacity called Metro Manila, i'd say its history narrative is indeed phony as well as its demographics part. Either rewrite or delete completely. --RioHondo (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Here, incidentally, is Onse's page at the official website of the City of San Juan. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 19:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and fix per discussion above. Stubbify to the basics and use reliable sourcing. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:28, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - with a few clicks, I found several sources. Bearian (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have copyedited it, removed nonsense, fixed the formatting issue, and found a couple of citations. Bearian (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.