Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole Olsen (filmmaker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ole Olsen (filmmaker)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete There's only one source. This source may not be reliable. Fails WP:FILMMAKER. Hayleez (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: Nominator clearly didn't do a WP:BEFORE check. Look at the amount of seemingly reliable sources on the Danish Wikipedia page, and Olsen's Worldcat entry shows that there are multiple books focused on him. Curbon7 (talk) 21:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. It is understandable why a review of online, English-language sources would suggest that the individual does not meet GNG, given that the worked mainly in Denmark and passed almost a century ago, but as noted by Curbon7 there are a huge amount of sources available offline and in Danish, as can be seen in the Danish version of the article. BilledMammal (talk) 03:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable (though perhaps more as a businessman than as a creative professional), and several high-quality sources exist (in Danish, at least) for expanding the article. Hqb (talk) 08:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep for the reasons above. Editors should WP:Assume Good Faith on offline, and non-English language sources especially when they are numerous and apparently reliable. BuySomeApples (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Kaffe42 (talk) 12:14, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.