Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olavi Hangula

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Olavi Hangula[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An autobiography that is not verifiable, of an aspirant politician who is not notable yet.I did not find any references reliable references other than local tabloids. Probably borderline A7, but as it is around already for a while, it is maybe better to discuss it. User:Elianamwiha (talk)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Hi @Elianamwiha: I'm not sure why you would link your signature to my account name? --Pgallert (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I'm not sure but what that was about but I've removed. Elianamwiha, please don't do that again. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I see nothing that would warrant the subject's current inclusion into the encyclopedia. "Junior tourism minister" is certainly not enough to establish notability, never mind "deputy head boy". Furthermore, the coverage in reliable sources is meager. This is pretty much all we've got; the rest of the sources are opinion pieces or irrelevant stuff. --Pgallert (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by all means, works and information are entirely trivial and unconvincing, and there's literally nothing beyond it, let alone chances of notability and substance. SwisterTwister talk 00:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete He is a high school student who is on track to be successful, although much could happen. However successful is not always notable and he is not notable yet. He may at some point be, but there is no gaurantee.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At best this article is WP:TOOSOON. He clearly fails WP:GNG. Either way delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.